Posted by garlonicon
Mar 25, 2025/06:58 UTC
In the exploration of enhancing the efficiency and privacy of blockchain transactions, a significant focus has been placed on the method of embedding proofs within transactions. Traditionally, proofs have been inserted inside the OP_RETURN
field of a transaction. This practice, while functional, presents limitations in terms of transaction size and the detectability of commitments.
A proposed shift in methodology suggests directly committing to the ECDSA signature by adjusting the R-value. This approach offers two primary advantages. Firstly, it results in a reduction of the overall transaction size, as it eliminates the need for additional data space traditionally reserved for OP_RETURN
. Secondly, it significantly improves the concealment of commitments, making it more challenging to ascertain whether any commitment has been attached to the transaction or not.
The implementation of this technique could potentially revolutionize the way data is stored and verified on the blockchain, offering a more streamlined and secure method for embedding proofs within transactions. By directly modifying the ECDSA signature, developers can maintain the integrity of the data while ensuring a higher degree of privacy and efficiency.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback