Posted by statoshi
Jun 25, 2026/18:21 UTC
The discussion highlights the complexity of modifying Bitcoin's block subsidy structure due to the inherent difficulty of the system in valuing itself in any standard unit of account. This problem arises because Bitcoin, lacking a self-awareness of its value, cannot effectively adjust miner revenue based on predefined security goals measured against typical fiscal metrics. The notion of using fiat as a benchmark for value is critiqued, suggesting that alternative methods need exploration given that fiat represents just one way to establish value.
An innovative approach proposed involves adjusting Bitcoin's block size dynamically in response to fluctuations in demand for block space. This method would theoretically stabilize the auction market for block space by expanding or contracting the block size according to the fees paid, thus addressing periods of low demand and preventing the market rate for block space from plummeting. This strategy was elaborated in a detailed presentation available here. Implementing such a dynamic adjustment could be achieved through a soft fork, provided adjustments remain within existing block size limits; otherwise, more complex changes, such as a hard fork, might be necessary to expand beyond these limits. The feasibility of this approach hinges on careful consideration of the technical nuances involved.
Thread Summary (14 replies)
Jun 23 - Jun 26, 2026
15 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback