Why CTV+CSFS and not TXHASH

The discussion centers on the technological aspects and functionalities of TXHASH, CSFS, and CTV within a specific domain. TXHASH is highlighted as not rendering CSFS obsolete, implying that CSFS still holds vital importance or functionality that TXHASH does not cover or replace. This distinction is crucial in understanding the complementary or distinct roles these technologies play within their ecosystem. On the other hand, TXHASH is positioned as a full replacement for CTV, indicating that it encompasses all the capabilities or uses that CTV previously offered. This transition suggests an advancement or improvement in the technology, possibly offering enhanced features, efficiency, or effectiveness compared to CTV.

Understanding the relationship between these technologies is important for professionals or stakeholders in the field. The fact that TXHASH does not eliminate the need for CSFS could point towards a specialization or division of tasks between the two, where each has its unique contribution to the system's overall functioning. Meanwhile, the replacement of CTV by TXHASH could signal a significant shift in how certain operations are conducted, potentially leading to changes in workflows, protocols, or standards. This information is critical for those involved in the development, implementation, or management of such technologies, as it impacts decision-making regarding system architecture, compatibility, and future development paths.