64 bit arithmetic soft fork
Posted by Chris_Stewart_5
Jan 13, 2024/15:03 UTC
The inquiry posed pertains to the potential modification of a specific check in regard to leaf versions within the realm of Bitcoin scripting and whether such an alteration would necessitate a hard fork. The sender is seeking clarity on the flexibility of consensus rules, especially in relation to tapscript leaf versions. An understanding of this can be gleaned from the referenced section of Bitcoin's source code hosted on GitHub, specifically within the interpreter component of the script subsystem at line 613 of the "interpreter.cpp" file.
For those interested in exploring the technical specifics, the mentioned section of code can be reviewed by visiting the provided GitHub link, which leads to the Bitcoin repository. This section of the codebase is instrumental for those looking to comprehend how modifications to Bitcoin's scripting language could impact the network's consensus rules and whether such changes can be implemented without a disruptive hard fork, thus preserving continuity and avoiding potential splits within the blockchain.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback