Exploring Extended Relative Timelocks

Posted by pyth

Jul 15, 2025/06:09 UTC

In the discussion regarding blockchain timelocks, a significant point was raised about the potential implementation of 8 block units following the initial 65535 blocks. The primary concern associated with this approach revolves around the complexity it introduces by necessitating the management of two distinct types of timelocks: long and short. This added complexity is viewed unfavorably because it enlarges the surface area for potential bugs within the system. Moreover, there is an underlying belief that users will not value the granularity provided by sub-8 block distinctions in such constructions, suggesting that the benefits of implementing this method may not outweigh the risks and complications. This perspective highlights the need for simplicity and reliability in blockchain functionalities, prioritizing user experience and system robustness over intricate technical enhancements that might not offer significant practical advantages.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback