Would OP_SUCCESS (OP_CAT) be spent?

Posted by 1440000bytes

Feb 7, 2026/18:00 UTC

The effectiveness of soft forks within the blockchain and cryptocurrency domain often encounters significant challenges, not due to technical shortcomings but rather because of a prevailing sense of apathy, particularly among miners. Despite the common perception that miners play a voting role in the implementation of soft forks, their primary function is actually to signal readiness, indicating whether the network is technically prepared to support these updates. This misunderstanding underscores the necessity of broader community engagement and awareness regarding the procedural aspects of soft forks.

Moreover, certain mining pools, such as Foundry, Antpool, and F2Pool, exert considerable influence over the default relay policy in core blockchain protocols. This influence highlights the importance of these entities in the overall ecosystem, suggesting that any efforts to address or mitigate the aforementioned apathy need to consider the specific roles and perspectives of these key stakeholders. Engaging with and understanding the positions of these major mining pools could be crucial for successfully navigating the complexities associated with soft fork implementations.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback