Posted by billymcbip
Dec 31, 2025/12:16 UTC
In the context of smart contract consolidations, particularly focusing on the OP_CCV operation, it is noteworthy to mention that this operation facilitates consolidations by accepting specific input parameters. These parameters include mode, set to CCV_MODE_CHECK_OUTPUT; a taptree identifier, marked as -1 indicating the current input taptree merkle root; a pk parameter also set to -1 denoting the current input internal key; along with an index value of 0 which points to the first output, and an empty data field. This structured approach allows for the effective consolidation of transactions within the same contract framework.
However, a limitation arises when the objective shifts towards making payments to a third party, identified through a new script pubkey (SPK). In such instances, the consolidation process facilitated by OP_CCV remains insufficient on its own. To successfully transfer value to a third party, an additional transaction becomes necessary. This secondary transaction is responsible for spending the consolidated output, thereby enabling the transfer of value outside the original contract's confines. This requirement underscores a critical aspect of smart contract operations on platforms supporting OP_CCV, highlighting the need for strategic planning in transaction structuring for third-party payments.
Thread Summary (15 replies)
Dec 30 - Feb 7, 2026
16 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback