Posted by cryptoquick
Feb 4, 2026/16:22 UTC
In a recent exchange, the importance of selecting an appropriate name for the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) was discussed, highlighting two potential names: Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) and Pay-to-QuBit (P2QB). The conversation emphasized the value of community feedback in this process, suggesting a period for public input on the naming decision. This approach acknowledges the significance of collective insight in refining aspects of the proposal, underscoring the belief that while the name plays a role, the foundational goals of the BIP are paramount.
The discussion also revisited the contribution of specific individuals to the development of spend script optionality, a concept integral to the proposal's innovation. Recognition was given to the pioneering work in this area, noting its influence on the current proposal and expressing gratitude for these foundational efforts. Additionally, there was an inquiry regarding any concerns beyond the proposal's name and the clarity of its spending rules, opening the door for further dialogue to address and resolve potential issues comprehensively. This exchange reflects a collaborative effort to refine and enhance the proposal, ensuring it effectively meets its objectives while incorporating valuable community and expert feedback.
Thread Summary (14 replies)
Dec 19 - Feb 6, 2026
15 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback