Posted by nkohen
Feb 5, 2026/15:24 UTC
The discussion revolves around the concept of MuSig-in-MuSig, specifically the notation A ^ (B ^ C), which, as noted, currently lacks a formal security proof. This point raises significant interest within cryptographic circles, especially for those engaged in enhancing the robustness and flexibility of digital signature schemes. The absence of a security proof for such constructs poses challenges and opportunities alike for researchers and practitioners in the field.
In light of this, an upcoming paper titled "Nested MuSig2" is mentioned, promising to address these challenges by detailing a secure method to nest MuSig2 keys. This advancement is poised to significantly impact the way private sub-AND clauses are implemented, offering more flexibility and potentially opening new avenues for the application of MuSig2 in cryptographic protocols. The anticipation of this paper's publication on the ePrint Archive underscores the ongoing efforts within the community to fortify and expand the usability of cryptographic mechanisms, ensuring they meet the evolving demands of security and privacy in digital communications. The integration of nested keys within the MuSig2 framework represents a notable development in this context, reflecting the dynamic and collaborative nature of cryptographic research.
Thread Summary (13 replies)
Jan 26 - Feb 5, 2026
14 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback