Basic vault prototype using OP_CAT

Apr 12 - Apr 12, 2024

  • The discussion highlights potential complications during the 'complete withdrawal' phase of a process, which have not been fully analyzed.

It is emphasized that for a 'complete withdrawal' to be properly enforced, it is crucial to ensure that the input index = 0. This stipulation is necessary to prevent a scenario where two input Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs) in a 'trigger withdrawal' state could be misused. Specifically, one could be utilized as a 'contract input' while the other serves as a 'fee-paying input', even if they originate from different vaults. Such an arrangement poses the risk of the second UTXO being drained to the miner as a fee, thereby circumventing intended security measures and protocols. This insight underscores the importance of stringent criteria and checks in the complete withdrawal phase to safeguard against potential exploitation and to maintain the integrity of the transaction process.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback