Signing a Bitcoin Transaction with Lamport Signatures (no changes needed)

Posted by Xiaohui Liu

Nov 15, 2024/21:54 UTC

Covenant mechanisms in Bitcoin's scripting language have sparked discussions regarding their functionality, especially without the OP_CAT operation. These covenants aim to control how Bitcoin can be spent, adding a layer of programmability and restrictions to transactions. The query raised explores the feasibility of implementing covenants without relying on OP_CAT for parsing or introspecting fields within a transaction, such as inputs and outputs. This question underscores the technical intricacies involved in Bitcoin script development, where operations like OP_CAT play a critical role in constructing complex spending conditions. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developers and contributors to the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, as it touches on the foundational aspects of Bitcoin's programmability and security features.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback