Solving CoinPool high-interactivity issue with cut-through update of Taproot leaves

Posted by ZmnSCPxj

Sep 26, 2023/06:50 UTC

Antoine receives a message from ZmnSCPxj, who asks if the term "OP_EVICT" is not appropriate for a certain purpose. The email does not provide any further details or context about what "OP_EVICT" refers to or the specific purpose in question. The email also includes a link to a web page on the Linux Foundation mailing list archive where Antoine can find more information.The email is brief and straightforward, with no additional content or questions. It is written in a professional tone and ends with ZmnSCPxj's signature and a mention of Proton Mail as the email service used.In summary, ZmnSCPxj reaches out to Antoine to inquire about the suitability of using "OP_EVICT" for an unknown purpose. The email lacks contextual information, but includes a link to a mailing list archive for further reference.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback