Solving CoinPool high-interactivity issue with cut-through update of Taproot leaves

Posted by ZmnSCPxj

Sep 26, 2023/06:50 UTC

Antoine receives a message from ZmnSCPxj, who asks if the term "OP_EVICT" is not appropriate for a certain purpose. The email does not provide any further details or context about what "OP_EVICT" refers to or the specific purpose in question. The email also includes a link to a web page on the Linux Foundation mailing list archive where Antoine can find more information.The email is brief and straightforward, with no additional content or questions. It is written in a professional tone and ends with ZmnSCPxj's signature and a mention of Proton Mail as the email service used.In summary, ZmnSCPxj reaches out to Antoine to inquire about the suitability of using "OP_EVICT" for an unknown purpose. The email lacks contextual information, but includes a link to a mailing list archive for further reference.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback