Posted by ZmnSCPxj
Oct 2, 2019/02:03 UTC
ZmnSCPxj proposed a radical idea to remove the "SIGHASH" flags from signatures, which he believes are a misdesign retained from the original Bitcoin 0.1.0 Alpha for Windows design. He suggested putting "SIGHASH" on public keys instead and encoding them as either 33-bytes (implicit SIGHASH_ALL
) or 34-bytes. Then, OP_CHECKSIG
and friends will look at the public key to determine the sighash algorithm rather than the signature. ZmnSCPxj also proposed adding an opcode called "OP_SETPUBKEYSIGHASH," which would allow the selection of SIGHASH
flag at time-of-signing if the script is formed to do so. By default, public keys will not have an attached SIGHASH
byte, implying SIGHASH_ALL
. This proposal removes the problems with SIGHASH_NONE
and SIGHASH_SINGLE
, as they are allowed only if the output specifically says they are allowed.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback