Motion to Activate BIP 3

In a recent discussion within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the development process was thoroughly examined. The conversation highlighted the growing trend among programmers to incorporate AI tools for generating initial code outlines. This practice, fueled by the significant time savings it offers, is becoming increasingly common. However, it also raises concerns about the integrity of submissions when the involvement of AI is not transparently disclosed.

The suggestion put forward is to mandate that submissions clearly indicate whether AI has been utilized and to what extent. This policy aims to introduce a level of transparency that could mitigate potential issues related to the review process. Given the ease with which AI can produce code, there's an understandable worry that reviewers might waste time evaluating submissions that lack original thought or effort. Instituting an honor system where developers are expected to be upfront about their use of AI is seen as a viable solution. While this approach relies heavily on the honesty of contributors, it is believed that the natural incentive to maintain credibility will discourage deceptive practices.

Moreover, the discussion acknowledges the complex implications of integrating AI into coding practices, touching upon both legal and qualitative aspects. Although recognizing the importance of these concerns, it is also pointed out that such topics extend well beyond the specific focus of Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 3 (BIP 3), highlighting the broader and more philosophical debates surrounding AI's role in software development. This acknowledgment underscores the multifaceted challenges and considerations that come with the increasing intersection of AI technology and programming work.