Posted by Eric Voskuil
Jun 29, 2024/01:31 UTC
In a recent exchange, the discussion revolved around enhancing the robustness of coinbase size verification post-socket read operations. The conversation specifically questioned the comparison between utilizing a non-null pointer check versus directly assessing the coinbase size for this purpose. Clarification was sought on whether the term "non-null pointer" referred to a conventional C programming pointer or to a transaction input designated as a "null point," characterized by a sequence of 32 repeating 0x00 bytes followed by 4 0xff bytes. The inquiry aimed to understand how the proposed method offers increased reliability in the context of transaction processing and system stability.
Thread Summary (32 replies)
Mar 24 - Jul 2, 2024
33 messages • 32 replies
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback