Ordinals BIP PR

Posted by Christopher Allen

Oct 24, 2023/23:08 UTC

In the email, Christopher Allen suggests that including the year and number in the year would be a good idea for the numbers mentioned. He mentions that at Blockchain Commons, they follow this practice for all research and "wallet improvement proposals". This approach helps to prevent the numbers from becoming too large like the current EIPs (Ethereum Improvement Proposals). Additionally, he proposes that the numbers should only be automatically offered if a maintainer does not reject them within three days. This would allow maintainers to focus on responding to obvious spam, and if a proposal is rejected, the moderator's name would be associated with it, rather than the current anonymous rejection process.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback