Relax OP_RETURN standardness restrictions

The discourse around modifying the Bitcoin network, specifically through the integration of features akin to Ethereum's Virtual Machine (EVM), raises significant concerns and considerations among its current user base. The proposition of relaxing limits to accommodate other protocols that diverge from traditional monetary use cases has encountered skepticism. Proponents argue that such expansions could potentially increase Bitcoin's market capitalization by attracting new functionalities and investors. However, this poses a dilemma for existing users who are primarily focused on Bitcoin's core financial utility rather than speculative market gains.

Furthermore, the challenge of quantifying the success of these proposed changes is complex. Metrics such as increased usage of oversized op_return might be cited as evidence of efficacy, yet the absence of such activity could conversely be interpreted as proof of the system's integrity without the need for alterations. This ambiguity underscores the difficulty in assessing the impact of integrating diverse data types and commitments within the Bitcoin infrastructure.

There is also an ongoing debate regarding user options in response to network changes. It has been mentioned that users inclined towards retaining expanded capabilities might migrate to Knots, whereas those opposed have the alternative to switch to Libre Relay. The suggestion here implies a wait-and-see approach, observing shifts in user preference toward either platform as an indirect measure of the community's reception to network modifications. This discussion reflects broader themes of adaptability, governance, and the balance between innovation and tradition within the Bitcoin ecosystem.