Unbreaking testnet4

The discussion centers on the differentiation between signet and testnet within the context of blockchain development. Signet is highlighted for its departure from the traditional permissionless block creation model inherent to testnets, opting instead for predictability. This shift raises questions about the fundamental purpose of testnets, particularly in terms of the availability and cost-free nature of coins for developers. The conversation suggests that, unlike conventional testnets, signet's design does not prioritize the free and easy acquisition of coins by developers, which could potentially alter its utility in testing scenarios.

Moreover, the concept of incorporating an "end of life date" into testnets is introduced as a novel idea, with implications that it has not been previously implemented across any network. This proposition aims to address the perennial issue of testnet sustainability and relevance, suggesting that a predefined expiration could enhance the effectiveness and management of these networks. The use of the term "reset" in the context of testnets is critiqued, with a recommendation to replace it with "abandon" to more accurately reflect the proposed operational changes. This language adjustment underscores the need for clarity and precision in discussing the lifecycle and maintenance strategies of testnets.