CTV + CSFS: a letter
Posted by Melvin Carvalho
Jun 10, 2025/02:28 UTC
In a recent discussion among Bitcoin developers, a significant consensus emerged regarding the criteria for implementing changes to Bitcoin's protocol. The core of the agreement highlights that any modifications to Bitcoin must undergo a rigorous evaluation process to ensure their safety, necessity, and desirability before they can be adopted. This principle places the onus of proof squarely on the shoulders of those proposing the changes, shifting the burden away from the broader community.
The discourse underscores a cautious approach towards amending the rules governing Bitcoin. It is articulated that unless the advantages of a proposed change are clearly superior to the potential risks involved, the default course of action should be to abstain from altering the existing framework. This methodology reflects a commitment to maintaining the stability and security of the Bitcoin network, prioritizing the well-being of the ecosystem over the pursuit of innovation without adequate validation.
This conversation reflects a prudent stance on Bitcoin development, emphasizing a methodical and evidence-based approach to evolution within the cryptocurrency's protocol. By insisting on demonstrable proof of safety, need, and community desire for changes, the debate reinforces the ethos of careful and considered development practices within the Bitcoin community.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback