Lamport scheme (not signature) to economize on L1

Posted by yurisvb at pm.me

Dec 23, 2023/00:26 UTC

In a recent communication, an important correction was made regarding the description of a function related to pre-image problems. The corrected description should refer to a function, denoted as f2_(TX,ECCPUB), which maps 'a valid LAMPPRI' to a tuple that includes both 'an address in the format of ADDRs' and 'a signature in the format of LSIGs.' The previous explanation provided was acknowledged as incorrect and has been retracted with apologies for any confusion it may have caused. The sender also expressed gratitude for the continued interest and promised to provide forthcoming details on the entropy calculations for both scenarios soon. This update emphasizes the importance of precision in technical communications and reflects a commitment to accuracy.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback