/
AlexPosted by Alex
Feb 20, 2026/01:41 UTC
The ongoing discussion within the Bitcoin Development community addresses a common misunderstanding regarding the proposal concerning Elliptic Curve signatures. Contrary to misconceptions, the proposal does not suggest disabling any existing algorithms such as Schnorr or ECDSA. Instead, it emphasizes a shift in how these signatures are utilized within the system. The core of the proposal is to change the Elliptic Curve signatures from being the implicit default through the key spend path to being explicitly invoked via a spending script. This approach retains Elliptic Curve signatures as the preferred method for transactions but alters the mechanism of their application to enhance clarity and specificity in their use. Misrepresentations of this proposal have led to confusion, prompting clarifications that no algorithm is being disabled, merely the method of its invocation is being refined. This clarification aims to correct any misunderstandings and highlights the importance of thoroughly reading and understanding proposals before making assumptions.
Thread Summary (41 replies)
Feb 9 - Mar 1, 2026
42 messages • 41 replies
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback