SHRINCS: an efficient hash-based signature scheme for Bitcoin (first draft)

Posted by Murch

Sep 15, 2026/22:39 UTC

The discussion highlights a concern regarding the potential format change for Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs). The primary issue addressed is the use of GitHub-flavored Markdown and the implications if BIPs were to be transferred to a different platform. The compatibility features specific to GitHub's Markdown could potentially become problematic if moved, thereby affecting the document's layout and readability.

Moreover, there's an acknowledgment of the decreasing costs associated with amending such formatting issues in documents. This reduction in cost lessens the burden of maintaining or altering document formats, making it more feasible to stick with Markdown rather than transitioning to another format. Consequently, the suggestion has been made to continue submitting documents in Markdown format unless there are other compelling reasons for a change. This recommendation supports maintaining consistency and stability in document management within the Bitcoin development community.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback