Bitcoin TLDR

#132

newsletter icon

Summary

Aug 24 - Aug 29, 2026

Our weekly newsletter is focused on keeping you updated on what's new in Bitcoin, and summarizes the bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and delving bitcoin mailing lists

The SHRINCS Working Group has proposed a draft for a new cryptographic Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP), introducing SHRINCS, a semi-stateful hash-based signature scheme aimed at enhancing security against quantum threats. The draft highlights the speed and compactness of SHRINCS but notes the complexity of its stateful nature and the high computational demands of its key generation and signing processes. Significant contributions by Jonas Nick and Mikhail Kudinov have improved interoperability and flexibility for high-frequency signing applications like the Lightning Network. Community feedback is sought to address the lack of essential components such as security proofs and optimized implementations (SHRINCS Working Group Draft, Video Interview).

The Time-Shifted Proof of Work (TSPOW) protocol introduces a two-stage process for Bitcoin transaction verification and coin minting, aiming to stabilize block times and address economic incentives for withholding mining efforts. Despite its potential benefits in reducing time variance and economic manipulation, TSPOW does not mitigate fundamental security issues like majority attacks and requires a hard fork due to significant changes in the block structure. Detailed analyses and simulations are available for community review and feedback in the TSPOW GitHub repository (TSPOW GitHub Repository).

Silent Payments in coinbase transactions (SPc) offer a more privacy-focused method for paying cryptocurrency miners, utilizing static public addresses to prevent exposure of transaction histories. This approach requires significant adjustments in mining pool operations and coinbase transaction structures, with ongoing community collaboration essential for refining and potentially formalizing SPc into a BIP. Security measures and operational logistics are crucial in preserving miner privacy while maintaining mining integrity (Silent Payments Discussion).

Active Discussions

A Post-Quantum Path for BIP 324

6 replies

By Liam Gilligan

Involving Olaoluwa Osuntokun, conduition+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 5, 2026 04:40 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 27, 2026 05:52 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The introduction of Post-Quantum Peer-to-Peer (PQ-P2P) technologies addresses vulnerabilities in current cryptography.

  • Two methodologies, Classical-Then-Upgrade (CTU) and One-Shot Hybrid (OSH), are proposed for protocol upgrades.

  • While CTU extends existing protocols, OSH requires fewer round trips but may compromise bytestream pseudorandomness.

post-quantum: solution ideas to "tripwire" - game-theoryissues + a certificate-based rescue protocol

2 replies

By Antoine Riard

Involving conduition

calendar icon

Original post on August 19, 2026 22:27 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 26, 2026 21:54 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email explores implementing a soft-fork in Bitcoin, focusing on block ordering and node reactions.

  • It discusses proposed solutions like merge-mining and BIP9 to manage consensus and activation challenges.

  • Additional topics include strategic miner behaviors, potential corporate-induced hard forks, and quantum-proof security measures.

PQC output type discussion

16 replies

By sipa

Involving conduition, fjahr+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on July 27, 2026 21:23 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 27, 2026 21:45 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Taproot introduced to aid PQC adoption in Bitcoin, but widespread use remains low.

  • Extension block proposal could address blockchain scalability, yet poses integration issues.

  • Bitcoin community's privacy advocates may swiftly adopt new PQC methods.

Segwit commitment to post-quantum witness data?

14 replies

By conduition

Involving sipa, ajtowns+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on July 10, 2026 23:13 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 26, 2026 19:32 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Challenges in blockchain block validation involve handling invalid blocks and verifying transactions.

  • Nodes pre-validate signatures, easing the validation load when new blocks circulate.

  • Risks of DoS attacks exist due to blocks with unvalidated transactions, suggesting further security measures.

Pragmatic definition of consensus for light clients

12 replies

By ajtowns

Involving Nuh, AdamISZ+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on August 26, 2026 13:27 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 27, 2026 15:56 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Blockchain consensus revolves around enforcing rules and identifying the most work chain.

  • Light client risks arise when not following the predominant chain and relying on external validations.

  • Innovations like Utreexo are developing less resource-intensive models for running full nodes.

Babilonia - probabilistic coinjoin and covert betting

5 replies

By AdamISZ

Involving olkurbatov

calendar icon

Original post on July 12, 2026 19:07 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 25, 2026 16:38 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Recent analysis identifies flaws in blockchain anonymity within specific betting transactions.

  • Proposed solutions include bet aggregation and advanced technologies to obscure transaction patterns.

  • Enhanced privacy methods introduce complexities and scalability challenges in transaction processes.

Boomerang: Bitcoin Cold Storage with Built-In Coercion Resistance

5 replies

By bitryonix

Involving Anzus_GemWallet

calendar icon

Original post on February 9, 2026 05:36 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 28, 2026 05:26 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A new model analyzes the dynamics of physical attacks on cryptocurrency holders.

  • It evaluates the effectiveness of security measures and suggests dynamic solutions.

  • The study is crucial for digital currency stakeholders, highlighting the need for innovative security technologies.

Disabling min-difficulty blocks on testnet4

3 replies

By garlonicon

Involving Seldenthuis, batman

calendar icon

Original post on March 22, 2026 13:19 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 29, 2026 20:21 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Recent testnet developments impact CPU and ASIC miner dynamics significantly.

  • A change on testnet5 may disable the min-difficulty rule to address these issues.

  • The conflict cycle between CPU and ASIC miners undermines effective mining equilibrium.

Seedroller and keyderiver: cli tools to generate BIP39 seed words and derive BIP380 keys

2 replies

By bubb1es

Involving Anzus_GemWallet

calendar icon

Original post on August 22, 2026 05:13 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 24, 2026 23:50 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The `-r` option ensures consistent outputs from repeated dice rolls using sha256 hashing.

  • This feature is essential for verifying the software's reliability through predictable results.

  • Comparative testing is discussed using [known_answer_100_rolls_no_os_entropy](https://github.com/bubb1es71/bitcoin-key-tools/blob/202a848866a666c9d855ff3157be32c1ecebd46c/seedroller/src/main.rsL474-L509) unit test.

Improving the Security of lArk OOR Channels with Equivocation Bonds

2 replies

By ademan

Involving GeorgeTsagk

calendar icon

Original post on August 18, 2026 17:28 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 25, 2026 20:43 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The proposed scheme adapts well to normal out-of-order transfers using "Fast Finality."

  • It replaces private key recovery with `OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK`, enhancing process simplicity and security.

  • Key scoping provides added security and effective management for regular OOR transactions.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback