Bitcoin TLDR

#112

newsletter icon

Summary

Jan 13 - Jan 18, 2026

Our weekly newsletter is focused on keeping you updated on what's new in Bitcoin, and summarizes the bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and delving bitcoin mailing lists

A recent update to Bitcoin Core aims to address a specific issue on testnet4 by disabling the minimum difficulty rule after block 150,000, an initiative expected to increase block interval times due to a significant reduction in effective hashrate. The community is exploring the potential impacts of this change, with discussions considering further modifications based on feedback, highlighting the collaborative nature of open-source development in the cryptocurrency sphere. Bitcoin Core update

In parallel, a new concept within the Quantum‑Resistant Address Migration Protocol (QRAMP) suggests putting legacy Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs) into a quarantine mode with a two-phase commit and spend flow to secure transactions against quantum attacks. This innovative mechanism, aimed at ensuring post-quantum security without excluding pruned nodes, involves technical challenges, notably in consensus enforcement and user experience, particularly regarding fee sponsorship and the avoidance of historical transaction lookups. The communication includes references to design notes and diagrams to elucidate the proposed solution. QRAMP discussion

Furthermore, the adoption of Nostr for notifying recipients about incoming Silent Payments transactions introduces a privacy-conscious method of informing receivers (Bob) of payments sent by senders (Alice). This approach, leveraging stealth addresses and Nostr, focuses on minimizing the receiver's scanning time while maintaining transaction privacy and security. The discussion emphasizes the development of a notification system that could streamline the payment verification process for Silent Payments, addressing potential challenges such as spam and the accurate provision of tweaks to ensure privacy and ease of use. Silent Payments and Nostr

Active Discussions

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

11 replies

By Antoine Riard

Involving Antoine Poinsot, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 00:23 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Developers discussed ASIC design and optimization in Bitcoin mining.

  • Ideas for improving mining efficiency and security were highlighted.

  • The conversation explored serialization challenges and innovative solutions.

Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3

8 replies

By Bryan Bishop

Involving Murch, Chris Stewart+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 7, 2026 00:42 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 00:47 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Bryan agreed on project readiness in a Bitcoin Development Mailing List communication.

  • His affirmation and contributions can be viewed on his personal page linked in the message.

  • The message emphasizes the value of community feedback and peer review in Bitcoin development.

Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade

2 replies

By conduition

Involving Erik Aronesty

calendar icon

Original post on December 17, 2025 20:57 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 18, 2025 16:11 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email debates commit/reveal protocols' efficiency and scalability in quantum-resistant cryptosystems.

  • It highlights a flaw in Erik's solution, allowing quantum adversaries to compromise system security.

  • The sender expresses a lack of full understanding of Erik's code, indicating a need for clearer communication.

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

89 replies

By AntoineP

Involving ajtowns, sjors+14 others

calendar icon

Original post on March 24, 2024 19:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 13, 2026 16:57 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • No invalid transactions would be validated under the proposed BIP54 rule change.

  • A specific transaction would have 8 fewer sigops counted under the new rule.

  • The rule change is deemed unnecessary due to lack of evidence supporting its need.

BIP352: PSBT support

29 replies

By nymius

Involving andrewtoth, josibake+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 17, 2024 11:51 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 16, 2026 13:40 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A Bitcoin Improvement Proposal aims to enhance spending silent payment outputs.

  • Documentation is provided on GitHub and in a Bitcoin development mailing list post.

  • The community seeks feedback to refine Bitcoin's functionality, inviting wider contributions.

Stealth addresses using nostr

11 replies

By setavenger

Involving 1440000bytes, AdamISZ

calendar icon

Original post on July 9, 2025 17:13 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 17, 2026 05:54 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The integration of notifications with Silent Payments via Nostr marks a major digital advancement.

  • A specification leveraging Nostr aims to make transactions more interactive and responsive.

  • Interested parties can join the discussion and development at [DelvingBitcoin](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/silent-payments-notifications-via-nostr/2203).

Spanning-forest cluster linearization

10 replies

By blockchainhao

Involving sipa, gmaxwell

calendar icon

Original post on February 5, 2025 01:08 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 16, 2026 15:21 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The simplex algorithm solves optimization problems by setting n-1 variables to zero.

  • It uses m+1 equations, not m+2, to find basic variables from free variables.

  • The optimization target and goal function are not counted as equations in calculations.

BMAX: pricing “sats now vs sats later” via a mining sharechain (no L1 changes, no custodians, no oracles)

7 replies

By coinjoinkillua

Involving VzxPLnHqr, ajtowns+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on December 16, 2025 19:00 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 18:49 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • There has been a misunderstanding.

  • I cannot summarize without the actual content or specific details.

  • Please provide the content or an email for assistance.

Hornet UTXO(1): A custom, constant-time, highly parallel UTXO database

2 replies

By setavenger

Involving jsarenik, tobysharp

calendar icon

Original post on January 11, 2026 21:25 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 18, 2026 16:11 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The inquiry examines Hornet Node's architecture and performance, comparing it to Bitcoin Core and libbitcoin.

  • Questions about benchmarking Hornet Node's performance and its database engine's versatility are raised.

  • The individual expresses a desire to study Hornet Node's source code for a deeper technical understanding.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback