Bitcoin TLDR

#89

newsletter icon

Summary

Aug 4 - Aug 9, 2025

Our weekly newsletter is focused on keeping you updated on what's new in Bitcoin, and summarizes the bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and delving bitcoin mailing lists

Antoine Riard announced the development of a natively multi-process Bitcoin full node in Rust, utilizing libbitcoinkernel to enhance node functionality and efficiency, with a demo showing successful block downloading without a binding generator. This project, still in the demo phase, aims for improved performance and integration across multiple platforms and architectures, addressing the challenges of transaction relay in a multi-process environment and exploring solutions for accurate validation (source).

James Tagg proposed the Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) protocol as a preemptive measure to protect Bitcoin from quantum computing threats, focusing on safeguarding vulnerable Bitcoins through a non-sovereign wealth fund model. This approach aims to maintain ownership rights and leverage dormant capital for humanitarian efforts, addressing the risks posed by quantum decryption without compromising Bitcoin’s value promise or forcing drastic measures like coin burning (source).

The Bitcoin Foundation laid out a framework for transitioning Bitcoin to quantum-resistant cryptography, highlighting the growing threat to current encryption methods from advancements in quantum computing. This detailed proposal includes a phased migration plan to ensure network-wide resilience against quantum vulnerabilities, emphasizing the selection of quantum-resistant algorithms and calling for community feedback to refine the approach. Additionally, Maxim Orlovsky’s recent advancements in the RGB project signify a leap towards enhancing Bitcoin’s programmability and privacy through smart contracts with client-side validation, indicating a collaborative effort within the Bitcoin community to foster innovation and address emerging challenges (source 1, source 2).

Active Discussions

[BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes

3 replies

By Murch

Involving Calvin Kim, Javier Mateos+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on July 29, 2025 23:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 10, 2025 06:58 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Javier Mateos approves of Calvin Kim's draft proposals on utreexo.

  • Mateos finds no need for immediate conceptual feedback, encouraging progress.

  • He advises Kim to proceed with pull requests, highlighting collaborative review.

Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support)

3 replies

By Josh Doman

Involving Greg Tonoski, conduition

calendar icon

Original post on July 22, 2025 21:44 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 8, 2025 20:48 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Programmers discussed integrating P256 into Bitcoin for better device compatibility.

  • Concerns include P256's slow validation times and potential NIST backdoor fears.

  • Emphasis on adapting to future quantum-resistant standards and WebAuthn compatibility challenges.

Stats on compact block reconstructions

33 replies

By 0xB10C

Involving ajtowns, Crypt-iQ+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on August 2, 2024 12:08 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 5, 2025 15:27 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • David Gumberg's contributions to the project were significant but not specified.

  • Recent transaction reconstructions were updated with statistics and GitHub discussions.

  • Average transaction request size has significantly increased, reflecting growing demand.

A simple backup scheme for wallet accounts

29 replies

By pyth

Involving salvatoshi, sjors+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on April 16, 2025 13:52 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 8, 2025 17:37 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The importance of secure encrypted backups for digital security is emphasized.

  • Technical and implementation aspects of creating encrypted backups are discussed.

  • Future encryption challenges and the role of community collaboration are highlighted.

Correcting the error in getnetwork - hashrateps

24 replies

By zawy

Involving sipa

calendar icon

Original post on June 2, 2025 10:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 14, 2025 00:25 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The formula \( \text{work} = \frac{(2^{256}

  • 1)}{\text{2nd\_lowest\_hash}} \) quantifies blockchain mining work.

  • "Effective difficulty" derives from comparing the lowest and second lowest hashes in mining.

  • This concept reveals the stochastic and comparative nature of blockchain mining efforts.

Exploring Extended Relative Timelocks

23 replies

By sjors

Involving pyth, stevenroose+6 others

calendar icon

Original post on July 10, 2025 04:50 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 12, 2025 03:35 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Lightning Network uses bits for obfuscated commitment numbers, as outlined in BOLT 03.

  • A suggestion is made for developers to propose a BIP to document this mechanism.

  • Opening a BIP would clarify the method and aid Bitcoin's technological evolution.

Changing the minimum relay feerate

7 replies

By garlonicon

Involving glozow, 1440000bytes+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on July 31, 2025 20:07 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 13, 2025 00:48 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The integration of Proof of Work enhances Bitcoin's security, especially for second-layer solutions.

  • Collaborative PoW efforts between users boost transaction security against double-spending attacks.

  • Users can opt for traditional fees or PoW, promoting inclusivity and combating spam.

Writing Simplicity Programs with SimplicityHL

2 replies

By niftynei

Involving sanket1729

calendar icon

Original post on August 4, 2025 19:21 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 6, 2025 22:37 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The reverse Dutch auction for transaction fees offers a novel, innovative approach.

  • A simplicityHL contract's structure closely mirrors that of conventional programming, easing developer entry.

  • Custom sighash implementation in the contract indicates an advanced customization and optimization effort.

Solutions for this new centralization INSIDE Bitcoin?

2 replies

By garlonicon

Involving davidtaubmann, jcorgan

calendar icon

Original post on August 6, 2025 01:36 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 13, 2025 03:01 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The author debates the futility of crypto ownership limits, citing real-world evasion examples.

  • Discusses the risk of hard-forks in cryptocurrency, affecting trust and asset stability.

  • Highlights technical hurdles in enforcing crypto restrictions, like the UTXO model's complexity.

RGB yellow paper: the formal specification of Bitcoin & Lightning smart contracts

1 reply

By VigSeth

Involving dr-orlovsky

calendar icon

Original post on July 31, 2025 04:40 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 9, 2025 14:59 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The email praises the RGB yellow paper and inquiries about its implementation plans.

  • It suggests creating "Toolboxes" for interacting with RGB-compatible smart contracts.

  • It expresses a desire to collaborate with Dr. Orlovsky on innovative contract applications.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback