He mentions that at Blockchain Commons, they follow this practice for all research and "wallet improvement proposals". This approach helps to prevent the numbers from becoming too large like the current EIPs (Ethereum Improvement Proposals). Additionally, he proposes that the numbers should only be automatically offered if a maintainer does not reject them within three days. This would allow maintainers to focus on responding to obvious spam, and if a proposal is rejected, the moderator's name would be associated with it, rather than the current anonymous rejection process.