bitcoin-dev

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

Original Postby Eric Voskuil

Posted on: June 29, 2024 01:31 UTC

In a recent exchange, the discussion revolved around enhancing the robustness of coinbase size verification post-socket read operations.

The conversation specifically questioned the comparison between utilizing a non-null pointer check versus directly assessing the coinbase size for this purpose. Clarification was sought on whether the term "non-null pointer" referred to a conventional C programming pointer or to a transaction input designated as a "null point," characterized by a sequence of 32 repeating 0x00 bytes followed by 4 0xff bytes. The inquiry aimed to understand how the proposed method offers increased reliability in the context of transaction processing and system stability.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback