FDTs are not reliant on the most recent block of transactions. Instead, they require an aligned window between the satisfaction of a child transaction's absolute and relative timelocks and the current block. This alignment is pivotal as it facilitates the establishment of more stringent security bounds within a specified timeframe.

John illustrated that having two consecutive aligned 64-block windows reduces the opportunities for dishonest miners to create low-feerate windows that are artificially aligned. Without the need for alignment, miners would have significantly more chances—65 in this case—to manipulate the system. Importantly, John notes the advantage of being able to adjust the window size, which offers users a means to balance latency against security. He also expresses agreement with a proposed idea, indicating a collaborative approach in addressing these technical aspects.

Furthermore, it is clear from the discussion that there is an ongoing effort to refine the trade-offs inherent in blockchain transaction protocols. By tuning the parameters of FDTs, developers can optimize for both timely transaction processing and enhanced security measures, ensuring the robustness of the blockchain against potential exploitation by dishonest participants. John's insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in designing secure transaction windows within blockchain systems.