All Activity

Read the most recent individual posts in chronological order.

Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (GSR)

1 reply

By Russell O'Connor'

Involving UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on November 7, 2025 15:50 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 7, 2025 15:50 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent discussions within the Bitcoin development community have introduced a significant proposal aimed at mitigating denial-of-service attacks that exploit the computational and memory resources during Bitcoin script execution. This has led to the suggestion of adopting a generalized sigops budget, now termed as the varops budget.

Motion to Activate BIP 3

1 reply

By Ruben Somsen

Involving Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch

calendar icon

Original post on November 5, 2025 01:10 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 5, 2025 01:53 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 3 (BIP 3) has seen significant progress since its initiation, moving from a planned phase to being proposed in March 2025. The proposal has been subject to extensive discussion and refinement over several months, evidenced by the over 600 comments on its GitHub page and multiple discussions within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List.

LNHANCE a soft-fork package

1 reply

By Brandon Black

Involving UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on November 3, 2025 23:05 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 3, 2025 23:05 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The LNHANCE proposal introduces a series of four new opcodes to the Bitcoin blockchain aimed at enhancing its functionality, specifically targeting improvements in the Lightning Network's LN-Symmetry implementation. These opcodes include OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY (CTV), OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (CSFS), OP_INTERNALKEY (IKEY), and OP_PAIRCOMMIT (PC), each with detailed documentation available on GitHub.

OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation

3 replies

By adiabat

Involving Boris Nagaev, conduition'+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on November 1, 2025 17:11 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 1, 2025 22:56 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The concept of Post-Quantum cross-input signature aggregation (CISA) represents an innovative approach to overcoming the challenges posed by large signature sizes in post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. Traditional methods of signature aggregation, which are beneficial for reducing transaction sizes on blockchain platforms such as Bitcoin, face limitations with post-quantum signatures due to their reliance on elliptic curve-based techniques.

[Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation

11 replies

By Juan Aleman

Involving Antoine Riard, Antoine Poinsot'+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on October 31, 2025 17:54 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 1, 2025 17:54 UTC

bitcoin-dev

Juan Alemán initiated a discourse within the Bitcoin developer community, expressing concerns over recent changes in version 30 of the Bitcoin Core defaults that significantly diverge from historical standards, which sparked discussions about a potential network fork. Alemán suggests that reverting these defaults could prevent such drastic measures and proposes a structural adjustment to the repository to reduce political influence on policy decisions.

By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus.

2 replies

By Doctor Buzz

Involving UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 30, 2025 00:03 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 30, 2025 00:03 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discussion centers on an innovative approach aimed at addressing the issue of UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) set bloat in Bitcoin, specifically targeting the reduction of "bulk dust" transactions. These are identified as a significant contributor to the expansion of the UTXO set, raising concerns among node operators and leading to proposals like BIP 444.

[Concept] Anticipation Pool - Off-chain scaling using miner-validated transaction forwarding

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 29, 2025 10:22 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 29, 2025 10:22 UTC

bitcoin-dev

Jakob Widmann has proposed a novel concept aimed at addressing the scalability issues of Bitcoin, specifically targeting the limitations inherent in the Lightning Network. His approach seeks to circumvent the complications associated with watchtowers and channel-based routing by leveraging the existing mining infrastructure.

segOP potential BIP discussion

2 replies

By moonsettler'

Involving defenwycke, UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 29, 2025 23:40 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 30, 2025 21:25 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The segOP proposal, introduced by Defenwycke, aims to significantly enhance Bitcoin transactions by establishing a segregated, structured, full-fee data lane for on-chain data storage. This initiative seeks to mitigate the current inefficiencies and limitations associated with arbitrary data storage within the blockchain, specifically addressing the issue of fee market distortion caused by Segregated Witness (SegWit).

[BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies

10 replies

By Melvin Carvalho

Involving Martin Habovštiak, Greg Maxwell+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on October 28, 2025 16:01 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 30, 2025 19:35 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent discussions within the Bitcoin community, particularly concerning the implementation of Core 30, have surfaced a significant divide among its members. In an effort to bridge this gap, Majorian, active in the community since 2017, has proposed a soft fork aimed at reinstating historical norms for the use of OP_RETURN in transactions.

[BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork

27 replies

By Lucas Barbosa

Involving Peter Todd, onyxcoyote+16 others

calendar icon

Original post on October 25, 2025 20:43 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 9, 2025 21:34 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The Bitcoin community is currently engaged in a rigorous debate over the proposed advancements of Bitcoin Core v30, particularly focusing on luke-jr's ML proposal, which aims to temporarily restrict arbitrary data at the consensus level. This initiative reflects a consensus that has sustained without objections for three weeks, underscoring the community's view of bitcoin principally as a currency and not a data storage solution.

Full Disclosure: Debug console history storing sensitive info in bitcoin core v24.0-v30.0

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 24, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 24, 2025 15:59 UTC

bitcoin-dev

A low-severity vulnerability has been identified affecting all versions of Bitcoin Core from v24.0 to v30.0. This issue, which concerns the potential exposure of sensitive information such as private keys and wallet passphrases through debug console history, was initially reported on GitHub and highlighted across social media platforms.

Public disclosure of 4 Bitcoin Core security advisories

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 24, 2025 15:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 24, 2025 15:53 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The Bitcoin Core team recently announced the resolution of four low-severity security vulnerabilities in version 30.0 of their software, underscoring their ongoing commitment to maintaining robust security standards. Initially, five vulnerabilities were slated for disclosure; however, one was subsequently reassessed as medium severity and its disclosure has been postponed in line with the team's security protocols.

Bitcoin Core 28.3 Released

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 21, 2025 20:42 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 21, 2025 20:42 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The latest version of Bitcoin Core, 28.3, is now available for download. This can be accessed directly through the provided link or via BitTorrent with the detailed magnet link included in the original announcement.

BIP54 implementation and test vectors

3 replies

By Antoine Riard

Involving Antoine Poinsot', UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 21, 2025 15:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 28, 2025 09:53 UTC

bitcoin-dev

Antoine Poinsot recently updated the progress on BIP54, also known as Consensus Cleanup, emphasizing its development and testing stages. A notable advancement includes the implementation against Bitcoin Inquisition version 29.1, which has been comprehensively documented.

op_return spam is beneficial

1 reply

By Erik Aronesty

Involving UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 19, 2025 13:01 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 27, 2025 03:39 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discussion surrounding the use of OP_RETURN in Bitcoin transactions delves into both economic and technical considerations, primarily focusing on its implications for issues such as spam, blockchain decentralization, and protocol development. The debate stems from the challenge of balancing the need to limit spam on the Bitcoin network with the potential benefits of using OP_RETURN, which include conserving Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs) and indirectly supporting network health by redirecting potential spam funds towards enhancing hash power.

Bitcoin Core 28.3 Release Candidate 2 Available

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 15, 2025 14:38 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 15, 2025 14:38 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent announcement regarding Bitcoin Core's new version v28.3rc2 highlights the availability of binaries which interested parties can download from Bitcoin Core's official website. This update serves as a release candidate for a forthcoming major version release, indicating its significance in the development cycle.

Compact block relay in knots using the extra pool

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 14, 2025 21:52 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 14, 2025 21:52 UTC

bitcoin-dev

In an intriguing exploration of compact block relay within the Bitcoin network, a developer conducted tests using a specifically configured node in Knots. The configuration aimed at assessing compact block relay performance included enabling debug for compact blocks (debug=cmpctblock), setting no minimum fee filter (feefilter=0), and increasing the block reconstruction extra transaction size to 300 (blockreconstructionextratxnsize=300).

Bitcoin Knots 29.2.knots20251010 released

By UTC | newest]

calendar icon

Original post on October 11, 2025 03:38 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 11, 2025 03:38 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The latest release of Bitcoin Knots, version 29.2.knots20251010, is now officially available for download. This new version can be accessed through the provided link and introduces several critical bug fixes alongside the inclusion of a new Dockerfile.

Bitcoin Core 30.0rc3 release candidate is available

By fanquake

calendar icon

Original post on October 8, 2025 09:28 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 8, 2025 09:28 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The latest release candidate for Bitcoin Core, version v30.0rc3, is now accessible for both testing and review. Interested individuals can download the binaries from Bitcoin Core's official website, while the source code is available under a signed tag at the project's GitHub repository.

[0/4] A Bitcoin Scripting Proposal BIP Quartet

7 replies

By [3/4] OP_TX Anthony Towns

Involving Anthony Towns, Brandon Black+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on September 27, 2025 08:12 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 6, 2025 11:41 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent discussions on Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) have brought to light several innovative concepts aimed at enhancing the functionality and efficiency of Bitcoin's scripting language, particularly with Tapscript v2. A key focus of these proposals is to introduce new opcodes and reinstate previously disabled functionalities to expand the capabilities of Bitcoin scripts without compromising network security.

[BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts

31 replies

By Anthony Towns

Involving Greg Maxwell, Dingocoin+14 others

calendar icon

Original post on September 24, 2025 18:18 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 1, 2025 03:39 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The Bitcoin Development Mailing List has been a platform for rich discussions on the nature and future of Bitcoin's technological framework, particularly focusing on mempool management, transaction relay policies, and the broader implications of censorship and autonomy within the network. At the heart of these conversations is a proposal aimed at altering the governance of mempool policy to empower users by decentralizing decision-making power regarding which transactions are relayed.

OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea

4 replies

By Erik Aronesty

Involving Peter Todd, moonsettler'+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on September 30, 2025 00:09 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 3, 2025 22:15 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent discussions within the Bitcoin development community have centered on enhancing the blockchain’s efficiency and security. One focal point of these conversations is the computational challenges and potential vulnerabilities associated with node operations, particularly in relation to the Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) set.

Add importprivkeys RPC

2 replies

By blocktraveler

Involving Email para newsletters'

calendar icon

Original post on October 3, 2025 07:34 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 21, 2025 19:21 UTC

bitcoin-dev

In the ongoing effort to enhance the usability and security of Bitcoin Core descriptor wallets, a notable conversation has emerged surrounding the complexities faced by users, especially in the Namecoin community, regarding the importation of private keys. The development of a Python-based tool named Core-Wallet-Migration-Tools available on GitHub aims to address these challenges by facilitating the migration of private keys into Bitcoin Core descriptor wallets.

[BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus.

45 replies

By Russell O'Connor'

Involving Doctor Buzz, Policy restrictions Was: " 'Russell O'Connor'+20 others

calendar icon

Original post on October 2, 2025 20:42 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 22, 2025 08:07 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discussions within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List have been rich and multifaceted, reflecting the community's dedication to addressing both immediate technical challenges and broader philosophical questions about the future direction of Bitcoin. A recurring theme in these discussions is the delicate balance between enhancing network security, optimizing performance, and preserving the decentralized ethos that underpins Bitcoin.

One of the central topics has been the proposal to limit the size of scriptPubKey within Bitcoin transactions, specifically aiming to cap them at a certain byte size to mitigate risks associated with oversized data fields.

[BIP Draft] Emoji Seed Mnemonics for Deterministic Keys

1 reply

By /dev /fd0

Involving [BIP Draft] Emoji Seed Mnemonics for Deterministic Keys Coperbyte Solutions

calendar icon

Original post on October 1, 2025 09:39 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 1, 2025 11:06 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discussion introduces a novel informational Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) focusing on the concept of Emoji Seed Mnemonics for Deterministic Keys. This innovative approach proposes a deterministic mapping between the standard BIP-39 English words, which encompasses a list of 2048 words, and unique sets of emojis, also numbering 2048.

On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr

18 replies

By waxwing/ AdamISZ

Involving Garlo Nicon, Tim Ruffing+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on October 1, 2025 14:24 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 1, 2025 14:49 UTC

bitcoin-dev

In an extensive discourse on the potential of embedding data within Schnorr signatures, particularly under the BIP340 framework, AdamISZ offers a critical analysis that zeroes in on the inherent challenges and limitations. The principal concern revolves around whether it is feasible to embed data into Schnorr signature tuples (P, R, s) without resorting to grinding or revealing the private key, which could compromise the security of the associated UTXO set.

Re: [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts]

5 replies

By Lőrinc

Involving /dev /fd0, Russell O'Connor'+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on September 26, 2025 13:26 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 29, 2025 15:24 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The conversation among Bitcoin developers and enthusiasts touches on several critical points regarding the scalability, operability, and strategic direction of the Bitcoin network. At its core, the discussion acknowledges the evolving nature of Bitcoin and challenges associated with maintaining a decentralized, efficient, and secure blockchain.

Bitcoin Core 30.0rc2 release candidate is available

By fanquake

calendar icon

Original post on September 28, 2025 21:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 28, 2025 21:46 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The availability of binaries for the Bitcoin Core version v30.0rc2 has been announced, accessible through Bitcoin Core's official site. This version is a release candidate for an impending major version release, indicating it is a pre-final release intended for testing purposes.

A Minimal, Executable Specification for Bitcoin Consensus

By Toby Sharp

calendar icon

Original post on September 20, 2025 02:25 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 20, 2025 02:25 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The email outlines the development of a new specification for Bitcoin consensus rules by the sender. This project is characterized by its adoption of a declarative-style and executable approach, utilizing modern C++ along with the inception of a domain-specific language (DSL) designed to enable formal verification processes.

[BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE)

7 replies

By conduition'

Involving James T', Erik Aronesty+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on August 4, 2025 21:18 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on August 19, 2025 20:59 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discussion surrounding the future of Bitcoin's cryptographic security, particularly in light of potential vulnerabilities exposed by advancements in quantum computing, reveals a complex landscape of technical challenges and proposed solutions. At the heart of these deliberations is the notion that the decentralized and algorithm-driven ethos of Bitcoin may, paradoxically, necessitate human intervention to navigate unforeseen technological threats such as the advent of quantum computing capable of breaking current cryptographic safeguards.

One of the primary concerns discussed is the vulnerability of Bitcoin’s Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) to quantum decryption, posing a significant risk to the integrity and ownership verification mechanisms of the blockchain.

A Post Quantum Migration Proposal

24 replies

By conduition'

Involving Saint Wenhao, Marc Johnson+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on July 12, 2025 21:36 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 15, 2025 16:24 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The discourse on enhancing Bitcoin's defense against quantum computing threats posits a phased proposal to transition the network towards post-quantum cryptographic standards. This approach is rooted in the urgency to protect the network against potential quantum attacks that could compromise its cryptographic underpinnings.

[BIP Proposal] Standard Encrypted Wallet Payload + Standard Encryption Envelope formats

By Keyser Söze

calendar icon

Original post on September 13, 2025 19:00 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 13, 2025 19:00 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent drafts shared within the Bitcoin development community aim to significantly enhance wallet interoperability and security through the introduction of two proposed Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs). The first proposal, titled Standard Encrypted Wallet Payload, introduces a CBOR-based format designed for serializing wallet data.

IRC logs: BIP 348 Workshop

By /dev /fd0

calendar icon

Original post on September 11, 2025 18:39 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 11, 2025 18:39 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The CHECKSIGFROMSTACK workshop, facilitated by Michael Zaikin on the ctv-csfs-activation IRC channel at Libera, brought together Bitcoin developers for an in-depth session. The workshop focused on discussing the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP), exploring its various use cases, and engaging participants in creating transactions.

BIP Booby Trapped Wallets - Covenant-Only Taproot Outputs

1 reply

By Matias Monteagudo

Involving BIP Booby Trapped Wallets - Covenant-Only Taproot Outputs Matias Monteagudo

calendar icon

Original post on August 21, 2025 17:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 11, 2025 09:47 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The proposal in question introduces a cutting-edge approach designed to bolster the security of Bitcoin wallets, particularly catering to the needs of institutional holders with significant Bitcoin assets. Authored by Matias Monteagudo, this Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) advocates for an additional, voluntary security layer that could fundamentally alter how high-value Bitcoin wallets defend against unauthorized access.

[BIP Proposal] Add BIP-0093 (Codex32) as application to BIP-0085

6 replies

By Aneesh Karve

Involving Ben Westgate', Javier Mateos+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on August 31, 2025 22:25 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 7, 2025 23:13 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The recent discussions and developments around the integration of BIP-0093, also known as codex32, within the framework of BIP-0085 have garnered significant attention in the cryptocurrency community. This proposed integration aims to leverage BIP-0085's capabilities for generating deterministic entropy from BIP32 keychains to create codex32 strings directly from BIP-0032 master keys.

[BIP Proposal] OP_TWEAKADD

4 replies

By jeremy

Involving Olaoluwa Osuntokun, [BIP Proposal] OP_TWEAKADD jeremy

calendar icon

Original post on August 23, 2025 17:35 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 6, 2025 21:27 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The ongoing discussions among Bitcoin developers have brought to light several key considerations and proposals aimed at refining the protocol's security and functionality. A significant point of discussion has been the potential adjustment of the operational cost associated with a new opcode, specifically considering its computational demands relative to existing operations such as OP_CHECKSIG.

IRC logs: BIP 119 Workshop

By /dev /fd0

calendar icon

Original post on September 5, 2025 02:28 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 5, 2025 02:28 UTC

bitcoin-dev

In the realm of Bitcoin development, an upcoming workshop is scheduled to take place on 11 September 2025 at 15:00 UTC. This event is set to be hosted on the ctv-csfs-activation channel on libera.chat.

[BIP Draft] Bitcoin Encrypted Backup

By pyth

calendar icon

Original post on September 4, 2025 06:58 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 4, 2025 06:58 UTC

bitcoin-dev

At WizardSardine, the development team has been exploring an encryption scheme suitable for Liana wallet descriptors for a considerable period, spanning at least two years. The quest for an appropriate scheme recently culminated with the discovery of Salvatore Ingala's publication on DelvingBitcoin, which proposed a clear and fitting scheme.

FROST CLI + BDK CLI Demo

By Christopher Allen

calendar icon

Original post on September 3, 2025 19:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 3, 2025 19:46 UTC

bitcoin-dev

FROST represents a significant advancement in Bitcoin technology, particularly due to its Schnorr-based signature capabilities and its support for Distributed Key Generation (DKG). This development is crucial as it ensures that a private key is never localized to a single point, enhancing security significantly.

[BIP Proposal] Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script

2 replies

By jeremy

Involving [BIP Proposal] Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script Olaoluwa Osuntokun

calendar icon

Original post on August 25, 2025 00:50 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on September 1, 2025 22:43 UTC

bitcoin-dev

The proposal to enhance Bitcoin's scripting language by introducing new Elliptic Curve (EC) operation op codes is aimed at leveraging the Taproot infrastructure to expand the blockchain's capabilities in facilitating complex operations directly within its script. This initiative paves the way for the computation of the top-level Taproot output public key using Bitcoin Script, enabling a more dynamic approach to creating smart contracts on the Bitcoin blockchain.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback