Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Matt Corallo, Antoine Riard+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Luke Dashjr criticizes using nLockTime for extranonce, highlighting lost ASIC optimization.

  • Jeremy Rubin proposes a sparse Merkle tree to avoid smart contract issues, facing skepticism.

  • The consensus favors pragmatic solutions over major protocol changes for Bitcoin's stability.

BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter?

1 reply

By Matthew Husák

Involving Murch

calendar icon

Original post on January 7, 2026 01:36 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 7, 2026 18:50 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Matt addresses issues in Bitcoin Core 30.0 related to `minrelaytxfee` and `incrementalrelayfee`.

  • He suggests adding `incrementalrelayfee` to `feefilter` for clearer RBF transaction policies.

  • This change aims to improve spam prevention, transparency, and peer compatibility without consensus risks.

Bitcoin Core v30.2rc1 Released

1 reply

By fanquake

Involving /dev /fd0

calendar icon

Original post on January 9, 2026 11:57 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 9, 2026 18:33 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Bitcoin Core version v30.2rc1 introduces enhancements, bug fixes, and updated translations.

  • Upgrade requires shutting down old software completely for a smooth transition.

  • The release is compatible with Linux Kernel 3.17+, macOS 13+, and Windows 10+.

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

88 replies

By AntoineP

Involving ajtowns, sjors+14 others

calendar icon

Original post on March 24, 2024 19:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 7, 2026 22:04 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The proposal reviews Bitcoin's flaws and offers improvement suggestions for security and performance.

  • It addresses specific vulnerabilities like the timewarp exploit and proposes measures to enhance network integrity.

  • Community feedback is sought for bug fixes and the block size reduction debate highlights scalability concerns.

A simple backup scheme for wallet accounts

31 replies

By reardencode

Involving salvatoshi, pyth+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on April 16, 2025 13:52 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 10, 2026 08:18 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Josh's method is similar to another but has unique features like inscription and location.

  • The suggestion involves standardizing Salvatore's method, then adding Josh's unique aspects.

  • This aims to merge the strengths of both methods for a comprehensive solution.

OP_CC: A simple introspection opcode to enable cheaper consolidations

13 replies

By billymcbip

Involving reardencode, sipa+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 12:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 5, 2026 20:32 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A new Tapscript opcode, **OP_CC**, aims to improve Bitcoin transaction efficiency.

  • **OP_CC** reduces the need for multiple signatures, saving blockchain space.

  • It streamlines UTXO consolidation, enhancing Bitcoin network efficiency and scaling.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback