Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

12 replies

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Antoine Riard, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 30, 2026 04:08 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 54 debate resurfaces, focusing on coinbase transaction nLockTime and its potential downsides.

  • Critics argue nLockTime usage could miss optimization chances; supporters see it as an elegant solution.

  • Preference emerges for pragmatic approaches over drastic protocol changes to maintain Bitcoin's stability.

BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max)

By Sebastian Falbesoner

calendar icon

Original post on February 4, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 4, 2026 17:20 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Performance issues in BIP-352's scanning method prompt a "K_max" protocol proposal.

  • The K_max protocol aims to limit recipients per transaction to improve efficiency.

  • Community feedback is sought through various channels to refine this protocol adjustment.

BLISK: Boolean circuit Logic Integrated into the Single Key

13 replies

By olkurbatov

Involving ZmnSCPxj, nkohen+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 26, 2026 23:23 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 5, 2026 15:40 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A new Bitcoin initiative enhances authorization with complex boolean logic in transactions.

  • It uses cryptographic techniques to integrate AND/OR logic, maintaining policy complexity off-chain.

  • This approach improves privacy, efficiency, and policy expressiveness without revealing policies externally.

Disposing of "dust attack" UTXOs

12 replies

By bubb1es

Involving andrewtoth, sipa+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 25, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 2, 2026 20:49 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Dust attacks on crypto wallets aim to link transaction addresses through microtransactions.

  • A solution suggests spending dust UTXOs on fees with OP_RETURN to prevent risks.

  • Implementing this feature poses challenges like user fingerprinting and multisig issues.

Major BIP 360 Update

11 replies

By cryptoquick

Involving ajtowns, josh+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 19, 2025 20:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 4, 2026 16:22 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Ethan Heilman and colleagues rewrote BIP 360 for clarity and quantum risk mitigation.

  • A new "Pay-to-Tapscript-Hash" output type is introduced to enhance Bitcoin's quantum resistance.

  • The revision includes Python and Rust test vectors, inviting community review for improved security.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback