Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Motion to Activate BIP 3

30 replies

By Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch

Involving Murch, Greg Maxwell+17 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 5, 2025 01:10 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 2, 2025 22:46 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 3 was proposed in March 2025 after finishing work in February and has been adjusted since.

  • Over 600 comments on GitHub and discussions on Bitcoin Development Mailing List show significant interest in BIP 3.

  • Changes include adopting SPDX License Expressions and refining BIP text for clarity and proposal viability.

A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain

15 replies

By Lazy Fair

Involving waxwing/ AdamISZ, Peter Todd+6 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 20, 2025 01:57 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 9, 2025 19:32 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email proposes a novel method for filtering objectionable Bitcoin blockchain content without harming its integrity.

  • It introduces a technique for maintaining data integrity post-deletion using specific internal hashing states.

  • The approach encourages collaboration on content moderation while respecting blockchain's foundational principles.

Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future

10 replies

By 'Mikhail Kudinov'

Involving Mikhail Kudinov', Olaoluwa Osuntokun+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 8, 2025 20:28 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 10, 2025 15:55 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Hash-based cryptographic solutions for Bitcoin focus on security against quantum attacks.

  • Optimizations in signature size have made hash-based schemes more practical for Bitcoin.

  • The discussion invites the Bitcoin community to explore the practicality of these solutions for long-term security.

Dust Expiry: Clean the UTXO set from spam

36 replies

By RobinLinus

Involving gmaxwell, ajtowns+11 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 20, 2025 01:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 14, 2025 13:24 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The proposal suggests a soft-fork for age-based expiration of dust outputs to reduce UTXO set clutter.

  • Since 2023, the UTXO set size doubled to 11 GB, mainly due to spam attacks.

  • Implementing a rule to make old, tiny outputs unspendable aims to diminish UTXO set size.

Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (Great Script Restoration)

12 replies

By Julian

Involving ajtowns, instagibbs+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on November 7, 2025 15:14 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 10, 2025 11:02 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A new Tapscript leaf version aims to mitigate denial-of-service attacks by introducing a varops budget.

  • Benchmarking with block-sized scripts ensures the varops budget's efficiency, with a focus on transaction-weight correlation.

  • Community involvement is critical in refining the varops budget through benchmarking and contribution to the GSR prototype.

Non-confiscatory Transaction Weight Limit

11 replies

By vostrnad

Involving ajtowns, instagibbs+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 28, 2025 19:01 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 13, 2025 00:14 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Several mining pools plan to support mining of non-standard, oversized Bitcoin transactions.

  • A proposed rule modification aims to allow certain heavy transactions without disrupting block creation.

  • The discussion on this topic underlines concerns about Bitcoin's future decentralization and network integrity.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback