All Activity

The latest version of libsecp256k1, version 0.7.1, has been officially released and is now available for download and use. This new release focuses on several key areas to enhance its functionality and security.

In a recent exploration of the advancements in BitVm flavors, attention was drawn to the foundational cryptographic primitive known as "garbled circuits". This concept is pivotal for facilitating secure multi-party games between distrustful parties, offering a framework to model channel jamming within blockchain technology as a multi-party game involving entities like Alice, Bob, and Caroll.

The integration of the Falcon post-quantum signature scheme into Bitcoin Core, as a soft fork within the Pay to Witness Public Key Hash (P2WPKH) mode, represents a forward-looking approach to enhancing Bitcoin's security against potential quantum computer attacks. The initiative, accessible for review at this GitHub repository, underscores the lattice-based scheme's advantages in terms of smaller public key and signature sizes compared to other post-quantum cryptography candidates.

The recent adjustments made to the Bitcoin Core code, specifically targeting the testnet4, represent a focused effort to address an identified issue regarding the minimum difficulty rule after block 150,000. This change, though seemingly minor, is significant in its potential impact on the network's functionality.

The Quantum‑Resistant Address Migration Protocol (QRAMP) introduces an innovative approach to enhance blockchain security against quantum threats by incorporating a two-phase commit and spend flow for legacy Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs). This protocol design is aimed at allowing these UTXOs to remain spendable even after the activation of quantum-resistant mechanisms, effectively placing them in a quarantine mode.

The latest release of Bitcoin Core, version v30.2, is now officially available for download from Bitcoin Core's website. This update brings with it a host of new features, various bug fixes, performance improvements, and updated translations.

The recent announcement of Bitcoin Core version v30.2rc1 marks a significant update, available for download at bitcoincore.org. This new release encompasses an array of enhancements including fresh features, numerous bug fixes, and performance improvements, alongside updated translations.

The recent discussions and developments within the Bitcoin community, particularly on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, have highlighted critical challenges and proposed solutions regarding transaction fees and network policies. Matt initiated a conversation emphasizing the difficulties users face due to discrepancies in minrelaytxfee and incrementalrelayfee settings across nodes.

The discourse regarding the adoption of Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 3 (BIP 3) within the Bitcoin community has been a focal point of recent discussions. Initially, the proposal received significant support from community members, with notable figures expressing their backing.

A significant issue has been identified in Bitcoin Core versions 30.0 and 30.1, where a bug related to wallet migration could lead to the deletion of all files in the wallet directory under certain conditions, potentially causing a loss of funds. This problem arises specifically during the failure of migrating a wallet.dat file.

Nic's discussion focuses on the norms surrounding unpaid exploratory work in the context of open-source funding models, particularly within the Bitcoin ecosystem. He notes a common expectation among grant administrators that preliminary work, including project outlining and scoping, should be carried out without compensation.

The draft BIP titled Safe Redaction, proposed for community feedback, aims to introduce a soft fork that would allow node operators the flexibility to redact arbitrary data deemed objectionable while still enjoying the full benefits of operating a node. The proposal utilizes BIP 3 as its foundation for a couple of significant reasons.

The conversation around Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 54 has reignited within the community, bringing to light varying perspectives on its technical implications and potential modifications. Central to the debate is Luke Dashjr's critique concerning the proposal's impact on optimizing ASIC controller operations, specifically regarding the utilization of the coinbase transaction's nLockTime as an extranonce.

The discussion initiated by Oren on BitcoinTalk and further elaborated in emails revolves around a proposed Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) focusing on Timelock-Recovery plans. This concept seeks to address the security concerns and logistical challenges associated with storing recovery seeds for Bitcoin, especially in terms of inheritance and long-term access.

In the realm of Bitcoin development, a nuanced conversation unfolds regarding the dynamics between Signet and Testnet environments, particularly from the perspective of mining. Saint Wenhao, a participant in this dialogue, shares insights into the operational mechanics and potential improvements within these testing frameworks.

The recent discourse on employing commit-based approaches for enhancing security within the digital transaction space highlights a consensus towards using commitments at each developmental stage, which inherently mitigates risks associated with MITM-style substitution and replay attacks. This method is favored as a safer, incremental step compared to an immediate shift to full quantum-safe (PQ) signature schemes.

The recent IRC meeting held on December 18, 2025, in the ctv-csfs-activation channel focused on discussing the activation parameters for BIP 119. Participants reached a consensus on employing BIP 9, opting for conservative parameters to guide its implementation.

In an effort to streamline communication and ensure that moderated emails reach their intended audience, a new procedure has been implemented for the Bitcoin Development Mailing List. A secondary mailing list, similar to the one previously found at https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/bitcoin-dev-moderation, has been established to handle moderated messages.

The discussion opens with the consideration of new peer-to-peer (P2P) messaging protocols that could enhance the functionality and efficiency of blockchain networks. Specifically, it highlights the potential benefits of implementing template sharing, updating the bip324-one-byte-message-types, and facilitating the sharing of recent stale blocks.

In a collaborative effort led by Ethan Heilman, Isabel Foxen Duke, and their team, there's been a significant revision of BIP 360 to enhance Bitcoin's resilience against potential quantum computing threats. This overhaul was initiated due to the need for clearer and more coherent proposals after community feedback highlighted that previous versions had undergone extensive technical changes.

Erik's proposal introduces a pioneering approach to safeguard the Bitcoin blockchain from quantum threats by implementing a novel security mechanism that does not necessitate the development of a new signature scheme. This method focuses on enhancing the proof of utxo ownership through a chain-native authorization primitive, leveraging the economic assumptions integral to transaction finality.

The implementation of silent payments in the Bitcoin Development Kit (BDK) is currently under exploration, focusing on incorporating this feature into BDK's transaction creation process, which is built around Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBTs). The initiative seeks to address a gap in the existing PSBT specifications by proposing modifications that would accommodate the nuances of silent payment transactions.

The ongoing discourse within the Bitcoin development community centers on addressing the timestamp overflow issue inherent in Bitcoin's blockchain protocol. A notable proposition involves deploying a soft fork to leverage the "timewarp attack," aiming to extend the functionality of the current system without necessitating a complete overhaul.

The discourse within the Bitcoin development community encompasses a broad spectrum of opinions on how to manage and mitigate spam within the Bitcoin network, as well as the broader implications for the network's functionality and philosophical underpinnings. Notably, the conversations reflect a deep engagement with both the technical and philosophical aspects of Bitcoin's design and operation.

One significant thread of discussion addresses the challenge of defining what constitutes spam on the Bitcoin blockchain.

The DustSweep proposal, crafted with the intention of addressing the accumulation of uneconomical dust in the Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) set within the Bitcoin network, aims to offer a structured method for consolidating these dust transactions. This initiative proposes a category of transactions that nodes would relay and miners include, specifically during periods when both mempool and block space utilization are low.

Victor is developing a non-custodial vault system with a focus on a 2-of-2 multisig construction and a CSV-based recovery path, aiming for a solution that enhances the security and functionality of Bitcoin transactions without introducing custodial risks. His system employs an immediate spending path requiring both keys for transaction authorization and a delayed recovery path facilitated by a time-delay mechanism.

Next week, a meeting will be organized to deliberate on the activation parameters for BIP 119. Participants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the related pull requests, various activation methods, and previous meeting logs to contribute effectively to the discussion.

The email discusses two Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) published by the sender for peer review. The first proposal, named BUDS (Bitcoin Unified Data Standard), is an informational proposal that aims to establish a neutral, non-consensus taxonomy for describing transaction data within the Bitcoin network.

The conversation within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List has been rich with discussions on enhancing Bitcoin's security landscape in anticipation of quantum computing advancements. One pivotal area of focus is the exploration and implementation of post-quantum cryptographic solutions that can provide robust security against potential quantum attacks.

The Bitcoin network is confronted with a significant issue due to its reliance on a 32-bit unsigned integer for timestamping, setting an overflow date of February 7, 2106. This limitation threatens the network's operational integrity, potentially leading to block validation failures, difficulty adjustment issues, malfunctioning time-locked transactions, and corruption of the Median Time Past (MTP) mechanism.

The primary focus of the ongoing project is to develop a method for removing objectionable content from the blockchain, adhering to a set of meticulously defined design goals. These goals ensure that the removal process remains optional, ensuring that each node can decide independently whether to engage in the removal of content.

The concept of managing Bitcoin's Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXO) set size through a feedback mechanism is presented as a solution to enhance the cryptocurrency's scalability and ensure long-term decentralization. Inspired by Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) control systems used in engineering, this strategy aims to mitigate the issues arising from the unbounded growth of the UTXO set, which could increase RAM requirements for nodes and potentially centralize the network among well-resourced participants.

The discussion around improving network traffic management for Bitcoin nodes has evolved significantly, focusing on the need for better segregation of traffic types to enhance security and efficiency. Initially, Bitcoin connections did not distinguish between different types of network messages, leading to a mixed traffic flow over a single network link.

The recent discussions and proposals within the Bitcoin Development community have spotlighted several advancements and considerations surrounding silent payment mechanisms, wallet descriptors, and the optimization of Bitcoin's technical infrastructure. A significant focus has been placed on enhancing wallet interoperability and the efficiency of backup and recovery processes through a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) which introduces a novel top-level script expression, sp().

In the latest exchange on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, a significant conversation unfolded regarding the utilization of SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) in cryptographic processes. It was highlighted that employing SIMD can lead to remarkable performance improvements, outpacing SHA-NI significantly.

The proposed Q-Lock: Quantum-Resistant Spending Protocol introduces a novel approach to securing Bitcoin against quantum attacks without altering the existing ECDSA cryptographic foundation. This protocol integrates a hash-based secret layer atop ECDSA, employing SHA256 and Merkle trees, which are already proven cryptographic methods.

The ongoing dialogue within the Bitcoin development community underscores a cautious yet forward-thinking approach to introducing new features, such as opcodes, into the network. A specific focus has been placed on the opcode known as OP_CTV (OP_CheckTemplateVerify).

The public release of Penlock marks a significant milestone in the domain of cryptographic security, particularly for individuals keen on securely managing their digital assets. Penlock is a novel tool designed to facilitate the mechanical splitting of a 12-word seed phrase into a 2-of-3 backup format.

The discourse surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of professional workflows, as shared by Oghenovo Usiwoma and Bitcoin Mechanic, presents a multifaceted view on the evolution of work processes with AI. The discussion underlines the natural human inclination towards seeking the most efficient means to achieve objectives, which increasingly involves leveraging AI tools. This trend is notably beneficial for a range of tasks including summarizing extensive discussions, prioritizing issues, identifying duplicate proposals, and spotting clear errors in coding practices.

The discussion delves into the challenges and implications of integrating Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) within Bitcoin's infrastructure, particularly concerning the management of objectionable content on the blockchain and the security of Hash Time-Locked Contracts (HTLCs). The core argument revolves around the innovative yet potentially exploitative nature of ZKPs in the context of Bitcoin, drawing parallels to the hypothetical threat posed by quantum computing to cryptographic security.

The draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal submitted for discussion aims at the standardization of on-chain identity publication. It introduces a specification that includes canonical CBOR payloads and employs Poseidon-based nullifier_hash domain separation with identifiers v0iden and v0corp.

The recent update on the Bitcoin backbone, as detailed in the communication, brings to the forefront several significant enhancements and developments aimed at refining the overall functionality and security of Bitcoin transactions. The primary focus has been on the re-implementation of BIP324, alongside efforts to eradicate bugs, introduce a simplified transaction relay stack, implement a mempool buffer, and lay foundational work for address management.

The ongoing debate among Bitcoin developers regarding the scalability and efficiency of the blockchain has led to a proposal that aims to address these issues without compromising on security. The proposal introduces a new opcode, OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH, which would allow miners to optionally commit a deterministic hash of the current Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) set into a block.

The feature request under discussion highlights the necessity for Bitcoin to improve its resilience against major solar events, such as significant solar storms, which could disrupt Earth's electrical and communication infrastructures. These disruptions pose a real threat to the integrity of the Bitcoin network, potentially causing fragmentation into isolated regions that continue mining independently.

The segOP proposal, introduced by Defenwycke, aims to significantly enhance Bitcoin transactions by establishing a segregated, structured, full-fee data lane for on-chain data storage. This initiative seeks to mitigate the current inefficiencies and limitations associated with arbitrary data storage within the blockchain, specifically addressing the issue of fee market distortion caused by Segregated Witness (SegWit).

In an extensive discourse on the potential of embedding data within Schnorr signatures, particularly under the BIP340 framework, AdamISZ offers a critical analysis that zeroes in on the inherent challenges and limitations. The principal concern revolves around whether it is feasible to embed data into Schnorr signature tuples (P, R, s) without resorting to grinding or revealing the private key, which could compromise the security of the associated UTXO set.

The LNHANCE proposal introduces a series of four new opcodes to the Bitcoin blockchain aimed at enhancing its functionality, specifically targeting improvements in the Lightning Network's LN-Symmetry implementation. These opcodes include OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY (CTV), OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (CSFS), OP_INTERNALKEY (IKEY), and OP_PAIRCOMMIT (PC), each with detailed documentation available on GitHub.

Antoine Poinsot recently updated the progress on BIP54, also known as Consensus Cleanup, emphasizing its development and testing stages. A notable advancement includes the implementation against Bitcoin Inquisition version 29.1, which has been comprehensively documented.

Juan Alemán initiated a discourse within the Bitcoin developer community, expressing concerns over recent changes in version 30 of the Bitcoin Core defaults that significantly diverge from historical standards, which sparked discussions about a potential network fork. Alemán suggests that reverting these defaults could prevent such drastic measures and proposes a structural adjustment to the repository to reduce political influence on policy decisions.

In an innovative step towards enhancing Bitcoin's security and efficiency, a new proposal introduces the concept of a generalized sigops budget, now termed as the varops budget. This initiative aims to preemptively allocate computational resources across all operations within the Bitcoin script execution process.

The Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process has seen notable updates and discussions, as detailed by Murch in a recent communication to the Bitcoin Development Mailing List. A significant focus of these updates was the consideration and eventual reversion of guidelines concerning the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in drafting BIPs.

The concept of Post-Quantum cross-input signature aggregation (CISA) represents a significant advancement in addressing the challenge of large signature sizes inherent to post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. The proposed method, OP_CIV or OP_CHECKINPUTVERIFY, is designed to be compatible with any signature type, including those based on post-quantum cryptography.