Your daily summary

Recent discussions within the Bitcoin development community have focused on various proposals and disagreements among its members. Moonsettler highlighted the need for better organization and visibility of active proposals such as CovTools, LNhance, and C3PO to enhance community engagement and awareness, acknowledging a missed opportunity in the "Covenant Beauty Contest" for proposal presentation (source). Matt Corallo's approach to implementing changes in blockchain technology through soft forks, specifically addressing quantum resistance without new address formats, indicates a shift in strategy to secure the blockchain's future. This proposal includes exploring hash-based signatures and achieving community consensus on the adoption of such technologies, with a detailed plan for implementation and documentation laid out for community feedback (source).

In a separate vein, Antoine Riard announced his intention to take legal action against Matthew Corallo, stemming from a profound disagreement over governance and respect within open-source software (OSS) projects. This dispute, arising from their collaboration on the rust-lightning project, highlights the tensions that can occur between contributors in the OSS community. Riard's move towards litigation emphasizes the need for a more collaborative and respectful approach in OSS development, aiming to set a precedent on how decentralization and contribution are interpreted and managed within such projects (source).

Filter by List

Active Discussions 🔥

10 replies

Authored by

/dev /fd0

Involving

moonsettler, Ethan Heilman

  • Significant updates to the Bitcoin covenants wiki were made in November 2024.
  • Feedback from Murch and Gloria led to the development of a use cases page.
  • A call for technical consensus highlighted the need for further opcode review and collaboration.

Today in Bitcoin/LN History

20 replies

Posted January 24, 2017 14:33 UTC

Authored by

Johnson Lau

Involving

Tom Harding, N+4 others

  • This proposal offers a solution to prevent replay attacks in blockchain splits, ensuring backward compatibility.
  • It introduces optional anti-replay protection for users, with no consensus changes required in the existing network.
  • The proposal fixes a signature checking bug and sets new transaction validation rules based on network characteristics.

All Activity

10 replies

Posted January 16, 2025 12:32 UTC

Authored by

/dev /fd

Involving

moonsettler, Ethan Heilman

In the realm of Bitcoin development, a series of discussions and exchanges have unfolded on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, revealing a vibrant collaborative effort aimed at refining and enhancing the functionality and efficiency of Bitcoin. A focal point of these discussions has been the evaluation and potential implementation of various proposals and opcodes designed to optimize Bitcoin contracts, including Resumeable LN channels, Multi-party LN channels, Vaults, and more.


Posted January 9, 2025 19:02 UTC

Authored by

Ava Chow

Bitcoin Core version 28.1 has been released and is available for download from Bitcoin Core's official website or via BitTorrent with the provided magnet link. This update introduces new features, various bug fixes, performance improvements, and updated translations.


6 replies

Posted January 9, 2025 12:24 UTC

Authored by

developer

Involving

Luke Dashjr, Owen Kemeys+2 others

The recent discussions on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List have sparked significant interest in the potential for adjusting the way transactions are processed and confirmed within the Bitcoin network. A major focus of these conversations has been on the utilization of the "nLockTime" feature, which traditionally is set to zero, suggesting its innovative application could enhance the protocol's resilience against control and censorship by indicating a transaction's readiness for immediate block inclusion.


4 replies

Posted January 7, 2025 21:33 UTC

Authored by

Yuval Kogman

Involving

Sjors Provoost, waxwing/ AdamISZ

The conversation delves into the intricacies of maintaining anonymity within cryptocurrency mixing services, pinpointing specific vulnerabilities and challenges that could compromise user privacy. It elaborates on the necessity of a meticulous approach to blind signatures in mixing processes, citing a correction made in Wasabi 1 to prevent potential disruptions.


11 replies

Posted January 2, 2025 00:43 UTC

Authored by

Matt Corallo

Involving

Luke Dashjr, Weikeng Chen+6 others

The ongoing discussions among Bitcoin developers about enhancing the network's security against potential quantum computing threats have shed light on various innovative proposals and considerations. One focal point is the challenge posed by post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and its integration into the Bitcoin protocol to safeguard against quantum attacks that could compromise cryptographic standards currently in place.


2 replies

Posted December 31, 2024 00:57 UTC

Authored by

stutxo

Involving

/dev /fd

The email delves into specific technical aspects of Bitcoin development, particularly focusing on the testing of packages and Pay-to-Address (P2A) functionality with the use of CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY (CTV) on Signet. It highlights an issue identified in the README documentation concerning an incorrect example that involves an output value discrepancy.


Posted December 25, 2024 20:57 UTC

Authored by

moonsettler

In the ongoing discussions within the Bitcoin development community, there has been a notable emphasis on addressing challenges associated with working with CTV (CheckTemplateVerify), particularly in the realm of vaults. Developers have been exploring solutions to circumvent these issues, leading to propositions such as OP_TX and OP_TXHASH/VERIFY.


2 replies

Posted December 21, 2024 23:03 UTC

Authored by

/dev /fd0

Involving

conduition

The discussion revolves around concerns and misconceptions regarding censorship resistance in ecash implementations, particularly with the Cashu protocol. The original assertion challenged the claim that all ecash implementations are inherently resistant to censorship, highlighting that specific mechanisms, such as P2PK (Pay to Public Key) and authentication processes, could potentially enable censorship of individual users.


2 replies

Posted December 19, 2024 20:00 UTC

Authored by

Anders

Involving

Michael Cassano

In an insightful exchange on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, a significant concern was raised regarding the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment mechanism amid observations of potential double exponential growth in the hash rate. This growth, if it continues, threatens to outpace the current mechanism designed to maintain a steady block time of approximately 10 minutes.


3 replies

Posted December 19, 2024 10:56 UTC

Authored by

Tim Ruffing

Involving

David A. Harding, Jonas Nick

Recent updates to a draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) have been shared, detailing numerous changes, improvements, and cleanups since its initial announcement. Significant amendments include fixing a security vulnerability concerning the CertEq signature not covering the entire message, adding blame functionality for identifying faulty parties with an investigation phase, making the threshold public key Taproot-safe by default, and allowing participants to encrypt the secret share intended for themselves.


2 replies

Posted December 13, 2024 17:16 UTC

Authored by

Bitcoin Error Log

Involving

George Burke, Michael Cassano

In a recent discourse within the Bitcoin development community, a novel proposal has been tabled that seeks to alter the conventional unit representation of Bitcoin. This proposition advocates for a radical departure from the current system, where one bitcoin is subdivided into 100 million base units (sats), each represented down to eight decimal places.


2 replies

Posted December 13, 2024 02:07 UTC

Authored by

Agustin Cruz

Involving

Jon Atack, Ian Quantum

The discourse on enhancing Bitcoin's security framework to counter the threats posed by advancements in quantum computing has been vibrant across various platforms, with significant contributions being made towards developing a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) specifically designed to introduce quantum-resistant cryptographic measures into the Bitcoin protocol. This initiative is driven by the recognition of the potential vulnerabilities that quantum computing could exploit within the existing cryptographic foundations of Bitcoin.


7 replies

Posted December 11, 2024 15:11 UTC

Authored by

/dev /fd

Involving

Jonas Nick, Yuval Kogman+2 others

The email exchange primarily revolves around the clarification and critique of a misunderstood proposal regarding example scripts for Lightning Symmetry involving hypothetical opcodes not yet implemented, specifically OP_VAULT. Brandon, in his correspondence, emphasizes that his intention was to explore theoretical possibilities rather than present production-ready solutions.


99 replies

Posted December 10, 2024 22:37 UTC

Authored by

Ava Chow

Involving

Léo Haf, Greg Tonoski+34 others

In the realm of Bitcoin development, discussions pertaining to the enhancement of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process have been prominent. A key focus has been on addressing the current bottleneck in managing BIPs, emphasized by Luke Dashjr's acknowledgment of his limited capacity to actively maintain the BIPs repository.


Posted December 5, 2024 17:48 UTC

Authored by

Antoine Riard

The report delves into a newly identified transaction-relay jamming attack targeting bitcoin time-sensitive contracting protocols, particularly affecting lightning channels. This attack exploits the transaction selection, announcement, and propagation mechanisms inherent in the base-layer full nodes of the Bitcoin network.


2 replies

Posted November 30, 2024 18:29 UTC

Authored by

jeremy

Involving

Erik Aronesty

The email introduces a novel methodology for the implementation of Bitcoin covenants that cleverly circumvents the need for alterations to the Bitcoin protocol itself. This is achieved through an inventive use of covenant emulators alongside signing servers, setting it apart from prior methods aimed at simulating covenants.


32 replies

Posted November 28, 2024 05:18 UTC

Authored by

Antoine Poinsot

Involving

Antoine Riard, Mark F+3 others

The conversation initiated by Antoine Poinsot sheds light on various aspects of the Bitcoin network's consensus mechanism, probing into areas that could benefit from improvement and adjustment. Poinsot zeroes in on concerns like the prolonged block validation times, which pose a threat to the network's overall efficacy and security framework.


4 replies

Posted November 27, 2024 22:37 UTC

Authored by

Ethan Heilman

Involving

Antoine Riard

The recent discussions within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List have shed light on several advanced cryptographic methods aimed at enhancing the security and functionality of Bitcoin transactions. A key focus has been on the method for proving the equivalence of y1 and y2 values in transaction scripts, a technique that underscores the importance of cryptographic soundness without relying on assumptions.


Posted November 24, 2024 21:13 UTC

Authored by

Ethan Heilman

Slashing covenants introduce a novel approach to enforcing rules for Bitcoin transactions differently from traditional methods. Instead of outright preventing an output from being spent, which could contravene the covenant's conditions, this protocol allows the transaction to proceed but penalizes the spender if they violate the set rules by slashing their funds.


4 replies

Posted November 23, 2024 19:45 UTC

Authored by

Brandon Black

Involving

moonsettler, Murch+1 other

The recent discussions among Bitcoin developers have highlighted several key considerations regarding the future of the Bitcoin protocol, particularly in relation to legacy script functionalities and the introduction of new opcodes. One focal point of these deliberations is the potential removal of the CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY (CSFSV) opcode from the legacy script in favor of using a combination of OP_CSFS and OP_VERIFY for similar functionality.


Posted November 22, 2024 18:54 UTC

Authored by

Antoine Poinsot

Antoine Poinsot has initiated a discussion regarding the Consensus Cleanup proposal to address the issue of potential duplicate coinbase transactions in the Bitcoin network. The primary focus is on preventing the necessity to re-enable BIP30 verification after the block height reaches 1,983,702.


1 reply

Posted November 21, 2024 23:57 UTC

Authored by

Ali Sherief

Involving

Antoine Riard

Compiling Windows for the ARM instruction set architecture involves configuring your compiler, such as gcc or clang, to build your kernel code specifically for ARM hardware platforms. This process does not require a unique ARM toolchain since modern compilers are capable of cross-platform compilation, including building on x86-64 and targeting ARM.


5 replies

Posted November 19, 2024 19:35 UTC

Authored by

Weikeng Chen

Involving

Garlo Nicon, Brandon Black+2 others

In recent exchanges on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List, a series of proposals and insights regarding the development of Bitcoin script functionalities were discussed, focusing on enhancing flexibility and capability without compromising the blockchain's efficiency or existing operations. One innovative idea proposed involves the integration of opcode contexts through the script version, which would allow for a dynamic mapping from opcode numbers to their corresponding instructions.


22 replies

Posted November 17, 2024 21:59 UTC

Authored by

Ethan Heilman

Involving

Matthew Zipkin, Andrew Poelstra+6 others

The conversation explores innovative approaches to blockchain technology, particularly focusing on the implementation of covenants and introspection within Bitcoin's blockchain without necessitating OP_CAT. The dialogue delves into the limitations and potentials of utilizing opcodes like OP_SIZE for creating sophisticated contracts or covenants.


bitcoin-dev

OP_PAIRCOMMIT

Posted November 15, 2024 00:00 UTC

Authored by

moonsettler

A new opcode, OP_PAIRCOMMIT, is proposed to be added to tapscript as part of the LNhance opcode family. This family includes CTV, CSFS, IKEY, and PC, aimed at enabling efficient rebindable channels adaptable to various covenant tree or channel factory constructions.


2 replies

Posted November 14, 2024 14:30 UTC

Authored by

Bryan Bishop

Involving

Weikeng Chen, Andrew Poelstra

The ongoing discussion raises concerns about the sustainability and reliability of hosting Bitcoin mailing lists, emphasizing the need for the community to secure its domain to ensure the longevity of critical communication channels. This arises from challenges experienced with external organizations like the Linux Foundation, which may not always provide indefinite support for Bitcoin-related projects.


1 reply

Posted November 12, 2024 16:07 UTC

Authored by

Matt Corallo

The recent discussions within the Bitcoin development community have brought attention to the limitations of the current BIP 21 standard, which primarily focuses on transactions using base58 addresses and lacks official support for more advanced addressing schemes like Segwit and Taproot. Given the significant adoption of wallets that can handle these newer types of addresses and decode lightning payment instructions from URI query parameters, there's a consensus on the need to modernize BIP 21. This update would not only accommodate the inclusion of Segwit and Taproot addresses in URI bodies but also support the evolving Bitcoin payment landscape, including Silent Payments and BOLT 12.


Posted November 4, 2024 18:29 UTC

Authored by

Robert Netzke

The post on Delving Bitcoin introduces a proposed file format for importing and exporting descriptor-based wallets, which the author suggests might be suitable as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP). The motivation behind this proposal stems from the complexities surrounding inheritance of digital assets, particularly for heirs who may not possess technical knowledge.


Posted November 4, 2024 17:45 UTC

Authored by

Jonas Nick

The latest version 0.6.0 of libsecp256k1 has been officially released, introducing several noteworthy updates and improvements to the library. Among the key enhancements is the addition of a MuSig2 module, marking a significant advancement in the library's functionality.


Posted November 4, 2024 15:34 UTC

Authored by

Adam Borcany

The exploration of Bitcoin transaction security through the implementation of proof-of-work (PoW) locked outputs presents a novel approach to adjusting difficulty in a more granular manner than current methods allow. Traditionally, signature grinding has been used to create PoW-locked output scripts in Bitcoin, exploiting the variable size of DER-encoded ECDSA signatures.


Posted November 4, 2024 13:06 UTC

Authored by

Michael Ford

The release of Bitcoin Core version 27.2 has been announced, available for download from Bitcoin Core's official website or through BitTorrent with the provided magnet link. This update encompasses several bug fixes, performance enhancements, and updated translations.


;
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback