Question about OP_CTV and Non-Recursive Covenants

Posted by josh

Mar 13, 2025/02:21 UTC

The discussion revolves around innovative concepts in blockchain and cryptocurrency transactions, specifically focusing on the idea of relative references and inherited IDs, as proposed by John Law. This concept is compared to a unique problem statement that involves making a blanket buy offer for a certain type of runes using sats across all UTXOs that hold at least a specified amount of these runes. The conversation delves into the capabilities of CheckTemplateVerify (CTV), exploring its potential to handle multiple inputs within a transaction, which could facilitate writing option contracts. There's a particular interest in whether CTV can commit to the outpoints of the inputs in a transaction, as opposed to just sequences, ScriptSigs, input index, and input count. This inquiry hints at a deeper exploration of how transactions using CTV might be structured to include multiple inputs effectively, thereby addressing the initial problem presented.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback