Feb 18 - Feb 19, 2025
These caches facilitate the process by which transactions that have already been verified in the mempool do not require full re-validation when they are subsequently included in a block. The script validation cache is particularly nuanced, containing validation flags that account for the status of consensus rules, which ensures its inapplicability post-softfork activations due to the change in rules.
Pieter Wuille raises an intriguing point regarding the potential redundancy within this system. His analysis suggests that transactions once validated in the mempool and later found in new blocks undergo what appears to be duplicate validation steps. This observation prompts him to question whether optimizing this process, especially for SegWit-verified transactions through the use of wtxid hashes, could eliminate unnecessary re-validations while maintaining network integrity. Wuille is seeking insights into the necessity of this apparent redundancy, pondering if the current mechanism indeed requires transactions to be fully re-validated upon block processing and what potential risks could arise from streamlining this process. His inquiry extends to the implications such optimizations might hold for transaction propagation timing and node synchronization, indicating a cautious approach towards modifying established protocols without overlooking possible complications.
This discussion encapsulates a deeper exploration into Bitcoin's core functionalities, highlighting areas where efficiency improvements may be possible without compromising the network's security or reliability. It reflects a thoughtful consideration of the balance between optimization and caution, inviting further examination of historical design choices and potential implications of proposed changes.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback